Some people believe that governments should invest more in public transportation to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. Others argue that individuals should take responsibility for their own transportation choices.

Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Sample Band 9 Structure:
Introduction: Paraphrase the prompt + state your opinion.
Body 1: Discuss government’s role (e.g., fund metros, tax incentives).
Body 2: Analyze individual responsibility (e.g., carpooling, cycling).
Conclusion: Reiterate your position (e.g., “While individuals must contribute, systemic change requires state intervention”).

Government investments in public transportation are a worldwide issue. While some believe that public transportation is a human necessity and helps curb air pollution, others contend that having one’s own transportation is much more comfortable and maintains a better travel experience. This essay analyzes both sides of the argument, and it will conclude that a balanced approach is best.

Proponents of public transportation argue that government investments in buses, subways, and metros help the city develop by attracting talent and making businesses more available. For instance, Shenzhen’s growth as a modern green city was only possible because of its transport infrastructure. Its network has not only given its citizens quick access to fast travel, but it has dealt with air pollution that results from potential traffic, thus giving it the name “Green City”. Due to the success of its initial transit lines, government investments have added five more lines to its network of trains, and this has alleviated road congestion as well. It does this by offering express lines, where it can move its passengers from one area of the city to the next quickly with few stops. Moreover, governmental investments in such public services have made strides providing transit to low-income groups. Now, the underprivileged who cannot afford to live in the city can commute into the city to attend schools, begin socioeconomic integration, and have equitable access to what the city has to offer.

Conversely, overcrowding in public transit is detrimental to commuter well-being. Sitting next to someone with body odor, or listening to loud conversations compromises passenger comfort. Tokyo’s rush hour is a perfect example. During rush hour, station workers overload transit cars past their capacity, and this creates anxiety, discomfort, and annoyance to everyone onboard. The mixture of various types of people can also create unwanted sparks. Arguments and physical confrontations may often happen, and unfortunately, your safety may be compromised. When roads are free, commuters consequently opt to drive their own cars or use private car services. This liberates commuters from traveling on a slower fixed schedule.

In conclusion, while government investments in public transportation is vital for reducing air pollution and traffic congestion, individuals should retain the freedom to choose private transport for comfort. A hybrid approach ensures that Shenzhen will continue as a role model without compromising freedom of choice for its citizens.