“Discussion + Opinion” Type Questions

Structure Follows the Prompt:

Introduction:

intro + merge – Paraphrases the debate
thesis – states the essay’s purpose.

Body 1: Discusses View 1 (funding the arts) with examples.

Body 2: Discusses View 2 (prioritizing public services) with counterpoints.

Conclusion: Offers a balanced opinion (“a modest percentage for arts, bulk for services”).

Essay

Introduction

The allocation of public funds to the arts versus essential services is a perennial debate. While some contend that arts subsidies are vital for cultural preservation, others prioritize healthcare and infrastructure. This essay will examine both perspectives before concluding that a balanced approach is optimal.

Body Paragraph 1 (Support for Arts Funding)

Proponents of arts funding argue that cultural institutions enrich society immeasurably. Theatres, museums, and music festivals not only safeguard heritage but also stimulate tourism and local economies. For instance, the West End in London generates billions annually, proving that arts investments yield financial returns. Furthermore, the arts foster creativity and critical thinking—skills crucial in an innovation-driven world. Without state support, many cultural gems might vanish, leaving future generations impoverished.

Body Paragraph 2 (Case for Public Services)

Conversely, critics assert that taxpayer money should address urgent societal needs. In nations with underfunded hospitals or crumbling roads, lavish opera houses seem indulgent. A single hospital’s budget could save countless lives, whereas a symphony orchestra benefits a privileged few. Prioritizing public services also promotes equity; free healthcare and education uplift marginalized communities far more than subsidized ballet tickets.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the arts elevate national identity and economy, essential services are non-negotiable for societal welfare. Governments should strike a balance—perhaps by earmarking a modest percentage of budgets for the arts while channeling the bulk toward healthcare and education. This compromise ensures cultural vibrancy without compromising public well-being.

(Word count: 250)